You are currently looking for an EMR software and are wondering which one is better for your needs. In this article, we will compare Athenahealth vs Cerner EHR, based on their features, geographic location, and rankings. You will discover which one offers more features, which is more important for your business, and which one comes with the best customer support.
Athena EMR Vs Cerner EHR
A physician might have different needs when it comes to EMR software and should consider the user interface when evaluating the two options. Although both Athenahealth and Cerner have user-friendly graphical user interfaces, these factors don't always translate to ease of use. In addition, physicians may find the AthenaHealth software difficult to use or require a lot of training before it can be used effectively.
AthenaHealth and Cerner both offer robust integration capabilities, with the former offering pre-built integrations with third-party applications. Cerner, meanwhile, provides three platforms to integrate clinical data and application program interfaces with other third-party systems. Demo sessions are a great way to assess both products before choosing one. These sessions can give you a better idea of the features and benefits of each one.
In our study of EHR usability, athenaHealth topped Cerner's offering. Cerner, on the other hand, was not on the ONC list of approved EHRs. However, Cerner will begin testing its software with the ONC in March 2017.
Rankings
There are many benefits of using an EHR, and Cerner and AthenaHealth have some unique advantages. In addition to a user-friendly interface, both have robust reporting features. Both are rated 3.9 stars on our emr software rankings, which take into account both user reviews and overall quality. To make a decision, we suggest reading the reviews of each product to see how they compare.
The two EHR systems were created by doctors, and they are highly functional. Both companies have different uses, but their primary focus is on community hospitals, academic medical centers, multi-specialty groups, independent practices, and rehabilitation facilities. They were created to improve medical workflows, and both are supported by mobile devices. The Ambulatory solution from Cerner supports voice dictation, and their complete processes are customizable.
Athenahealth has developed robust practice management and client engagement product, and it is the only company to score in both categories. Its specialized applications remove most of the organizational tasks from the back office, and it enhances financial outcomes by leveraging data-driven analytics. It is cloud-based, and upgrades are routinely released. And while Athenahealth has a superior reputation for ease of use, it is not as versatile as Cerner EHR.
Geographic location
The two biggest differences between Athenahealth and Cerner EMR software are the geographic locations of each company and the number of customers they have. The former has 4609 customers, while the latter has 59. Both companies are well-known in the healthcare industry. However, when it comes to the geographic location of their customers, AthenaHealth is slightly ahead of Cerner.
The two companies have similar customer bases, although AthenaHealth has more customers in the United States and the United Kingdom. Cerner's customer base is wider and includes more institutions than Athena's. The two companies also share the same revenue model, although Cerner has a bigger customer base. But, the geographic location of both companies has its benefits and disadvantages.
Athena is more geographically diverse and is more affordable. Cerner's customer support staff is more responsive than Athena's, and its software is better for large HDOs that need 24/7 support. The company's customer support is available during business hours, but it requires consent for privacy purposes. The software is available at both large and small hospitals. But the decision is a personal one.
Post a Comment